| Pages: 1 2 3 4 [5] 6 7 |
81. End of GTC<->ISK trade? - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Originally by: Argenton Sayvers Edited by: Argenton Sayvers on 30/01/2007 21:56:24 Maybe you just dont understand, but right now, every account is paid for. Some people pay 15$ a month, some 1500$. If you somehow think that you are spe...
- by Tarkan Kador - at 2007.01.30 23:10:00
|
82. End of GTC<->ISK trade? - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Originally by: Serendib I'm recently new to this game, and the main reason that made me play it, its the fact the game is play to play. Why is it play to play? Instead of pay to play? Because in Eve you can actually buy a gtc with gold and...
- by Tarkan Kador - at 2007.01.30 21:24:00
|
83. End of GTC<->ISK trade? - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
The more important question for me isn't the unfairness associated with buying ISK with GTCs. Its trying to justify why anyone should pay good money for this service, when people who don't pay for the service are lagging up the game, taking opport...
- by Tarkan Kador - at 2007.01.30 20:28:00
|
84. Change in the wind for virtual property sales? - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Originally by: FingerThief What ? In short: I pay good money each month to be here, and have to put up with problems caused by those who don't pay. Simple enough? Please resize your signature picture to be no more than 24000 byt...
- by Tarkan Kador - at 2007.01.30 19:56:00
|
85. Change in the wind for virtual property sales? - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Originally by: Cerwyn Taraman Well I don't really like the GTC for isk issue, but the people doing it ARE paying for their subscription because somewhere, somehow, along the line of sales, CCP is getting paid for the Gametime card by whoev...
- by Tarkan Kador - at 2007.01.30 17:39:00
|
86. Change in the wind for virtual property sales? - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Edited by: Tarkan Kador on 30/01/2007 16:50:54 Ultimately, the game runs on the backs of the people who pay , not the people who play . Right now, we have people who seem to love playing EVE, and love maintaining accounts, but not enough to...
- by Tarkan Kador - at 2007.01.30 16:54:00
|
87. Proposal for Populating Low-Security - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Edited by: Tarkan Kador on 21/01/2007 05:33:52 Edited by: Tarkan Kador on 21/01/2007 05:33:14 Originally by: Daos Leghki They key difference between this and current 0.0 mechanics is that this encourages the "owners" of a system ...
- by Tarkan Kador - at 2007.01.21 05:30:00
|
88. Proposal for Populating Low-Security - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Edited by: Tarkan Kador on 20/01/2007 17:01:26 Edited by: Tarkan Kador on 20/01/2007 16:57:36 I do not like the proposal. I love lowsec because I don't need to have a huge organized structure to find good PvP, and have some efficacy in te...
- by Tarkan Kador - at 2007.01.20 16:59:00
|
89. Regarding recent security concerns. - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Edited by: Tarkan Kador on 20/01/2007 16:39:19 Originally by: kieron It doesn't matter if the requestor is in a single man corporation or a 1000+ member alliance, sharing account information is still against the EULA. In short, just d...
- by Tarkan Kador - at 2007.01.20 16:42:00
|
90. GTC sales abuse - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Edited by: Tarkan Kador on 17/01/2007 04:48:25 Originally by: Dai007 But it doesn't affect anyone, aslong as the GTC sales are followed by the rules then there is no problem. It does cause harm, or at least it can, because we are...
- by Tarkan Kador - at 2007.01.17 04:48:00
|
91. About time for a change - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Originally by: Nanobotter Mk2 OP has a great idea but missing 1 thing. All player corps 100% open and you cannot be kicked form them. That way all the people he wants to kick out of npc corps can be assured to join what ever player corp th...
- by Tarkan Kador - at 2007.01.16 19:20:00
|
92. The wisdom of NBSI - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
I think NBSI is going to be bad for 0.0 in the long run, because the developers will simply redirect development away from alliances/sovereignety/0.0. Its already starting to happen with things like factional warfare, the focus away from big fleet...
- by Tarkan Kador - at 2007.01.14 06:17:00
|
93. EVE Honor - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Originally by: SSgt Sniper You're again trying to have it both ways. I think that's the goal. If you are a serious power player in EVE, then actually having to limit one's actions to only those which are acceptable to others is no...
- by Tarkan Kador - at 2007.01.13 04:49:00
|
94. EVE Honor - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Originally by: Rod Blaine Originally by: Opai McTwist I belive you're shifting the grounds of the argument a touch. Yup. That's because there's two discussions going on here. The op asks where one needs to place our REAL LIF...
- by Tarkan Kador - at 2007.01.13 04:14:00
|
95. Reputation.. and why it doesnt matter - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Originally by: Valrandir Is there something you don't like about reputation being important in EvE? The reason I don't like reputation being important in EVE is the same reason Dentara Rast enjoyed reputation being important in EVE....
- by Tarkan Kador - at 2007.01.11 01:45:00
|
96. Bloggers #45, Oveur reveals more about Revelations 1, 2 and 3 - in EVE Information Portal [original thread]
This blog scares me a lot. Somehow this "need for speed" kick seems all about making the game more complicated where its complicated enough, and taking away a lot of the richness we come to EVE to experience in the name of "insta gratification." ...
- by Tarkan Kador - at 2007.01.11 01:11:00
|
97. The BoB victroy over ASCN and why they might be able to kill Eve. - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Look, if the devs are helping an alliance they are in, they aren't going to admit to it. Nor is the alliance being helped going to admit that it happens. Regardless, its CCP's game. They can do anything they want and have it be alright, and if you...
- by Tarkan Kador - at 2007.01.09 21:54:00
|
98. Reputation.. and why it doesnt matter - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Someday, the top 100 posters with "good" reputations are going to call someone a scammer, and have it stick, whether the accused scammed, or not. In my opinion, the reason we have so much vile play in EVE is not because the developers allow it, b...
- by Tarkan Kador - at 2007.01.09 21:20:00
|
99. The BoB victroy over ASCN and why they might be able to kill Eve. - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
I think that the GMs, Devs, Investors, etc. should be able to play on Tranquility. However... I do think it is inappropriate for them to ally themselves with any customers against other customers, because one side will have instant access to hav...
- by Tarkan Kador - at 2007.01.09 04:37:00
|
100. Completly new Galaxy - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
For me, the "one server" concept isn't anything that keeps me in EVE. Its more like something I put up with to play EVE. I think its that way for a lot of players, which is exactly why CCP won't do it. Heck, if I was here at launch and had as muc...
- by Tarkan Kador - at 2007.01.09 04:03:00
|
| Pages: 1 2 3 4 [5] 6 7 |
| First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |